Inventors
How
I Learned To Become A Successful Inventor |
|
Part
1: History was the Key
By
Ronald
J. Riley
George Santayana (1863–1952), a U.S.
philosopher and poet said, "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned
to repeat it." A study of the history of American inventors, especially
inventors whose careers started between 20 and 40 years ago, has been crucial
to my success as an independent inventor. America's phenomenal economic
success has been driven by a number of factors such as abundance of natural
resources, a population of pioneers that were willing to take risks, and
most important American inventiveness. Our patent system led to the formation
of many great companies such as AT&T / Bell, Ford, GE, IBM, and Litton
to name a few. The problem is companies who are birthed by inventors have
a life cycle similar to, but generally longer, than man.
When young these companies were run
by the inventors and were willing to take big risks introducing new inventions.
With success, and middle age, they became more rigid and less willing to
take risk. They continued to invent but the inventions were not as dramatic
as those that founded them were. They also generally become predators on
other inventors during their mid life. They use their huge resources and
influence to crush the upcoming generation of inventors and generally do
their best to not compensate the inventor.
Sustained success over a long period
often leads to stagnation. Once stagnation sets in the companies lose the
desire to innovate and are unwilling to take any risk. At this stage in
their life, they become very active politically in an effort to legislate
an environment where they can continue to profit without risk.
There were many opportunities, niches
to fill, for inventors during the first 75 to 100 years of our history.
During that time the difference in size and assets between the big and
small companies was much smaller than today. The patent system worked very
well to during this time.
The next 100 years was a bleak time
for most solo inventors. The very companies that were founded by innovators
became predators that did their best to crush any upstarts that dared to
challenge them. During this time the only way inventors were likely to
succeed was by starting their own company. Things were so bad that some
inventors committed suicide.
Those who attempted to sell patents
generally died paupers, and a business manager type, who was not creative
and did not appreciate the value of invention, usually displaced those
who started companies. The inventor / founder generally suffered the same
fate as their pears who simply tried to sell their patent. During this
time, the only inventors that succeeded were those that were in a niche
market, able to grow a company without crossing swords with an entity that
was much larger than they were.
Before the formation of the CFAC
(Circuit Federal Appellate Court), it was next to impossible for any inventor
to get justice. The courts ruled repeatedly that independent or small entity
patents were not valid.
The CFAC was established about a
decade ago. Within three or four years, it started handing serious defeats
to those who have copied and stolen the property of inventors. Now our
patent system is being attacked by the same entities that have been found
guilty repeatedly. Their solution is not to start dealing in a reputable
manner but instead to alter our patent laws so they can return to the good
old days when they simply took what they wanted.
Which brings me to my study of a
number of contemporary inventors who started their careers during the dark
ages before the CFAC was established. I studied the following inventors.
-
Damadian - MRI
-
Gorden Gould - Laser
-
Wilson Greatbatch - Pacemaker
-
Bob Kearns - Delay windshield wiper
-
Jerome
Lemelson - Machine vision, Automated warehouse, etc. Over 500 patents
Each of these
inventors continued to invent while their ideas were being stolen. They
all fought protracted battles to protect their rights. Many of them lost
battles in spite of the fact that they were right; yet, they still pressed
on to produce more inventions. They persevered in spite of disappointments.
Both Gordon Gould and Lemelson
have been the objects of industry smear campaigns. Gould prevailed, in
spite of the fact that the whole laser community was involved in the attack.
Lemelson is currently being attacked by much of industry. NAM, AIPLA and
IPO are all active in the attacks.
Gordon Gould is the inventor of the
laser. Jerome Lemelson is the third most prolific inventor in the history
of our country (Edison is first, Land is second) and the most prolific
inventor of our time. He is now in his seventies, a philanthropist that
has funded numerous historical and educational programs.
Through their foresight and shear
tenacious, this generation of inventors blazed a trail and set an example
that allows my generation to invent and gives us at least a fighting chance
of being compensated for our inventiveness.
Continue
with >>> Ronald Riley Gives His Hot Tips
for the Aspiring Inventor
Previous Features
Important disclaimer information about this About site.
|